The Supreme Court of Pakistan has served notices to Imran Khan, Fawad Chaudhry, Asad Umer in ECP contempt cases.
On Tuesday, a three-member SC bench comprising Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Ayesha A Malik, and Justice Athar Minallah heard the case filed by the ECP to transfer all its contempt cases against PTI leaders from different high courts to a single one.
In the contempt of case, the Election Commission of Pakistan has accused the ex-premier of levelling “baseless allegations” against the ECP and its chief in his addresses on July 18, 21, 27, August 4 and 10.
During the course of Today’s proceedings, the bench remarked that the Election Commission requested to transfer the cases pending in different high courts to one high court.
The ECP was of the opinion that they should prepare for local and general elections or had to fight cases in different courts, it added.
The Chief Justice said that the Election Commission also presented a judicial precedent of merging cases with the order of the Supreme Court.
The Election Commission is relying on Article 186A, he added.
He asked was there an example of the decision of the Supreme Court to merge the cases of different high courts?
The ECP counsel responded that the SC ordered consolidation of income tax cases pending in various high courts in 1999.
Chief Justice said that clubbing of cases pending in different high courts must have the same point of law.
He asked who were the petitioners in contempt of Election Commission cases in the high courts?
The counsel said before the bench that Imran Khan, Fawad Chaudhry and Asad Umar had filed cases against the Election Commission in the different high courts.
Justice Ayesha A Malik remarked that the Supreme Court in the PEMRA cases had declared that the high court cases would continue and would not be clubbed.
Justice Athar Minallah said that the Supreme Court had clubbed all the cases of the high courts in Hajj assistants case.
The ECP counsel said that the cases of the same nature would have conflicting judgments in different high courts.
Justice Ayesha said that the SC would decide when the conflicting decisions challenged before the apex court.
The Chief Justice asked under which constitutional authority did the Supreme Court order clubbing of cases pending in the different high courts?
The counsel said that the injunctions of the high courts in the contempt of Election Commission case had also been challenged in the Supreme Court.
The court has directed that the ECP petitions against the injunction of the high courts should also be fixed with this case.
The hearing of the case was adjourned for two weeks.
The ECP in its filed petition stated that it had issued contempt notices to PTI chairman Imran Khan as well as other party leaders including Asad Umar, Fawad Chaudhry in the months of August and September.
However, these notices were challenged in high courts.
The ECP noted that under Section 10 of the Election Act, 2017, it had the authority to initiate contempt proceedings being a constitutional body.
The commission further stated that PTI Chairman Imran Khan and Fawad Chaudhry had challenged the contempt notices before the Lahore High Court’s Rawalpindi bench while Asad Umar had challenged it before the Sindh High Court.
While, another one was challenged before the Islamabad High Court.